Bilateral vocal cord paralysis following coronary artery bypass surgery / 대한마취과학회지

No abstract available.

Preoperative increased heart rate is related to the blood pressure decrease during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery

BACKGROUND: Hypotension is a very common side effect of spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. If we can predict the degree of blood pressure decrease after spinal anesthesia, hypotension will be treated better. Tachycardia may reflect the effective circulatory volume deficit. We studied if preoperative heart rate can predict the degree of hypotension after spinal anesthesia. METHODS: Fifty-two parturients for elective cesarean delivery were enrolled and the gestation periods of all parturient were over 37 weeks. In the supine position, noninvasive blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were measured as baseline values. After change to the right decubitus position, spinal anesthesia was done. Hyperbaric bupivacaine 8 mg and fentanyl 15 microg were injected intrathecally through 26G spinal needle. After return to the wedged supine position, BP and HR were measured every minute until anesthetic level was fixed. If mean BP decreased below 70% value of baseline, ephedrine 5 mg was injected intravenously. The lowest mean BP, hypotension (<80% of baseline) and total ephedrine requirement were recorded. Retrospective analysis was done after grouping by baseline heart rate (below 80 vs. over 80 beats/min). RESULTS: The patients who had more rapid heart rate before anesthesia, tended to have more decrease of mean BP during spinal anesthesia (P < 0.001, R = 0.45). In retrospective group analysis, the incidence of hypotension was lower in low HR group (46% vs. 83%, P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: If preoperative heart rate is over 80 beats/min, careful management is required to prevent hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.

Effect of airway pressure on lumbar epidural pressure during positive pressure ventilation / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to measure lumbar epidural pressure (EP) during the insertion of a Tuohy needle under general anesthesia and to evaluate the influence of airway pressure on EP. METHODS: Lumbar EP was measured directly through a Tuohy needle during intermittent positive pressure ventilation in fifteen patients. Mean and peak EP were recorded after peak inspiratory pressures (PIP) of 0, 15, and 25 cmH2O. RESULTS: All measured lumbar EPs were positive, with the pressure increasing during inspiration and decreasing during expiration. Median EP was 6.0 mmHg (interquartile range, 4.0-8.0) at 0 cmH2O of PIP, 6.5 mmHg (4.5-8.5) at 15 cmH2O, and 8.5 mmHg (6.0-10.5) at 25 cmH2O, increasing significantly at 15 cm H2O PIP, and further increasing at 25 cmH2O (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the influence of increased airway pressure on lumbar EP measured directly through a Tuohy needle. Lumbar EPs were positive, and increasing PIP levels significantly increased lumbar EP.